Cem Ilkel vs Enzo Couacaud Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Couacaud analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Enzo Couacaud Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 1 Couacaud
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.84% of points on his second serve, while Couacaud has won 50.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 52.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Couacaud has won 49.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.38% and 35.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 52.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Couacaud has saved 61.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 40% of matches played (W/L 20/ 30), with Couacaud winning 60.87% (W/L 28/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Couacaud has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 185/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 50/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19), where as Couacaud has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 3 and Couacaud winning 2. The last match between Ilkel and Couacaud was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 11-01-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Enzo Couacaud getting the victory 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Couacaud have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Couacaud 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 2, and Couacaud 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.26 while Couacaud has played against players with an average rank of 230.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Couacaud has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 41.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Couacaud has converted 40.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
414
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
210
Rank
151
High
29
Age
R
Plays
15
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
Form
56% (401-313)
Career Total W/L
61% (345-219)
39% (9-14)
YTD W/L
67% (18-9)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$698,440
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Cem Ilkel | Enzo Couacaud |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
Games Won | 27 | 26 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 18 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:43 | 1:55:43 |
1st Serve % | 57% (96/168) | 58% (100/171) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (75/96) | 66% (66/100) |
2nd Serve Win% | 44% (32/72) | 59% (42/71) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 43% (6/14) |
Return Points W% | 37% (63/171) | 36% (61/168) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
104)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
6-2 7-6(4) |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Enzo Couacaud
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Cem Ilkel | Enzo Couacaud |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 39% (9/14) | 67% (18/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 39% (20/31) | 62% (41/25) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (208/257) | 54% (337/291) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) | 60% (6/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.5 | 0.56 |
Aces Total | 113 | 170 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 51 | 86 |
Avg Match Time | 1:29:54 | 1:44:37 |
Avg Opp Rank | 171.04 | 265.11 |
1st Serve % | 57% (805/1413) | 57% (1105/1942) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (566/805) | 75% (832/1105) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (284/608) | 50% (421/837) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (38/94) | 41% (85/208) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (479/1345) | 41% (870/2138) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 71% (17/7) |
Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (8/22) | 68% (17/25) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 55% (6/11) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 58% (7/12) |
1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 81% (16/13) |
1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 13% (16/2) |
1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 45% (11/5) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Enzo Couacaud Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Enzo Couacaud
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
118
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Seong Chan Hong
47%
(
38 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
110
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex Molcan
Player
Enzo Couacaud
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Jakub Paul
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Manuel Guinard
Player
Enzo Couacaud
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-6(11) ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Jiri Vesely
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
SF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gianluca Mager
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more